Interest Groups APGov
This commit is contained in:
parent
4b8b5eb3ec
commit
4048546b78
57
apgov/Interest_Groups.md
Normal file
57
apgov/Interest_Groups.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Interst Groups Influencing Policy Making
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Pluralism
|
||||||
|
The idea that a magnitude of views will ultimately find a consensus on some issues
|
||||||
|
## Lobbying
|
||||||
|
applying pressure ot influence the government in order to get them to do something in the group's favor
|
||||||
|
## Big Idea: Multiple actors and institutions to produce and implement possible policies
|
||||||
|
## Free-Rider Problem
|
||||||
|
lack of resources in smaller groups.
|
||||||
|
## Iron Triangle
|
||||||
|
an illustration of the relationships between a congressional comittee, and agency, and the interest group.
|
||||||
|
## Issue Networks
|
||||||
|
groups with a collective goal. Work together to support the solution to a specific issue
|
||||||
|
## Direct Lobbying
|
||||||
|
directly trying to influence the legislators. writing op-eds, press releases, television, print advertizing. Calling directly: all forms of direct lobbying
|
||||||
|
## Lobbyists
|
||||||
|
people who work on establishing relationships with legislators in order to help the person/group they are lobbying for
|
||||||
|
## Legislative Activity
|
||||||
|
??? does not exist ???
|
||||||
|
## Think as a Political Scientist:
|
||||||
|
Use the table below to answer the questions that follow
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. What conclusions can be made from the information presented in the table?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
it can be made out that men are more affected by smoking than women
|
||||||
|
2. What information would make the table more useful to lawmakers as they crafted the 2009 law?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
displaying the same information for all the idfferent categories. such as putting cornary heart disease in with those who actually get that who are not secondhand smoke people
|
||||||
|
3. What information might the tabacco industry want shown to defend their product?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
the amount of people who do not die from their products
|
||||||
|
4. How could this data have been presented in a different visual format to convey the information more clearly?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
showing bar charts that would show where the discrepancy of the death between the different people/demographics
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Social Media
|
||||||
|
can influence the general populus which will influence the legilator
|
||||||
|
## Implementation
|
||||||
|
??? not in the text?!
|
||||||
|
## Electoral Activity
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Other Activity
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## 501(c)(3)/501(c)(4) groups
|
||||||
|
501c3 churches, hospitals. tax deductions. can influence but are not allowed to lobby government officials or donate to campaigns
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
501c4 is allowed to spend on political things. but cant be more than half of expenditures
|
||||||
|
## Endorsement
|
||||||
|
person's/company's expression of support that is public
|
||||||
|
## Grassroots lobying
|
||||||
|
mobalizing large numbers of people in order to work on an issue
|
||||||
|
## Essential Question: What are the benefits and potential problems of interest-group influence on elections and policy making?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Benefits of interest groups-
|
||||||
|
gets politics moveing as well as demonstrating some of the public's opinions
|
||||||
|
2. Drawbacks of interest groups-
|
||||||
|
can influence too much of the government and typically allows the most resource people to have the most influence on the government
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user