add amsco apgov hw
This commit is contained in:
parent
4048546b78
commit
4af6e11315
52
apgov/Campaign_Finance.md
Normal file
52
apgov/Campaign_Finance.md
Normal file
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|||||||
|
# Campaign Finance
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Federal Election Campaign Act (FECA)
|
||||||
|
tightened reporting requirements and put limits on candidates' expenditures. After key race between Nixon and McGovern with $91 mill
|
||||||
|
## Federal Election Commission
|
||||||
|
monitor and enforce regulations of the election process. Also sets standards for an election. a PAC must have 50 members, donate to 5 candidates, and register with FEC 6 months before election
|
||||||
|
## Key Provisions of the 1974 Federal Election Campaign Act
|
||||||
|
* Limited individual contributions to $1000 per election
|
||||||
|
* Limited a candidate's own contributions to $50,000 per election
|
||||||
|
* Definition and Regulation of donations of PACs
|
||||||
|
* Created public fund to assist viable presidential cadidates
|
||||||
|
## Hard Money
|
||||||
|
donation given directly. therefore can be traced and regulated
|
||||||
|
## Soft Money
|
||||||
|
donation to party or interest group. therefore not as easily tracked and obscures the actual finances. Allows for massive spending
|
||||||
|
## Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act (BCRA)
|
||||||
|
in 2002. banned soft money contributions to national parties. but increased most other amounts in order to accomodate the changes
|
||||||
|
## Required Court Case: Citizens United v. FEC (2010)
|
||||||
|
Did the BCRA violate first ammendment? Yes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
spending money from a pac is not a quid pro quo
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Impact of Citizens United
|
||||||
|
Debates of free speech and elections heavily increased.
|
||||||
|
usage of money in elections balooned
|
||||||
|
## Dark Money
|
||||||
|
money that does not have any transperancy and is virtually unlimited
|
||||||
|
## Think as a Political Scientist
|
||||||
|
### Read the excerpt from James Madison's Federalist No. 10, and explain how it could be used as a justification for the concerns about PACs nad campaign finance.
|
||||||
|
having a group who is fundraising for canidates would protentially give that group control of the government which would represent them instead of the citizens of the republic
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Connected PACs
|
||||||
|
Coorperations, labor unions and trade orgs working together for canidiates. But money must come from donations from the members and not from the company's treasures
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Nonconnected PACs
|
||||||
|
no sponsoring organizations and are around a single issue. take donations from the general public.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Leadership PACs
|
||||||
|
type of non-connected PAC. created by current or former elected official . BUT cant be used for their own campaign's fundraising
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Super PACs
|
||||||
|
most recent PAC. Opened for larg pacs and unlimited donations
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Essential Question: How does the organization, finance, and strategies of national political campaigns affect the election process
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
1. Factors in Campaign Finance
|
||||||
|
* unlimited because free speech
|
||||||
|
* regulations on usage and conflicts of interst
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
2. Influence of Factors
|
||||||
|
* spending money on campaings in order get advertising which would support the
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user